360 Y-DROP®

Overview

HEADS YOU WIN. TALES YOU WIN.

Regardless of the season, with 360 Y-DROP, you win:

SOMETIMES, YOUR RETURN WILL BE AN INCREASE IN YIELD

In 2015, mother nature threw buckets of water over much of the corn growing regions of the US. That pushed nitrogen deep into the soil – making it unavailable to the corn plant. Mid-season nitrogen application through 360 Y-DROP fed the crop at the critical time and boosted yields by an average of 13.8 bushels per acre.

EXTEND THE APPLICATION WINDO

Even in a year where nitrogen wasn’t the limiting factor for many of us, corn responded to mid-season application by adding over seven bushels. 360 Y-DROP gives you the flexibility to extend the midseason application window from V6 to VT — more than 30 days — for more control over when and how your nitrogen is applied.

PRECISION PLACEMENT FOR INCREASED UPTAKE

Moving N application closer to the root mass improves effectiveness – and adds about five bushels. With 360 Y-DROP, you can apply nitrogen within 2 to 3 inches of the stalk base — that means nearly 80% of the root mass is in the application zone. The funneling effect of corn leaves then pushes the nitrogen to the root mass for rapid uptake, even with modest precipitation or dew.

KEY FEATURES

  • New narrow-row design with four-position adjustable arms allows precision placement in 15-inch to 36-inch rows
  • Variable rate nozzles are available for customizing the rate, time and placement of nitrogen
  • New breakaway mounting brackets allow for easier navigation across hills and uneven terrain
  • Newly designed shield keeps leaves from wrapping around the riser or hoses

 


Testimonials

Find out what farmers are saying about 360 Y-DROP® and how it’s helping improve their yields.

“What really saved the year was putting that application, and without 360 Y-DROP you cannot do that.” See More

Jason Mauck
Gaston, Indiana

“With the improved placement, frankly it’s a game changer in terms of growing corn at a higher level in the neighborhood that we farm.” See More

Stan and Aaron Smith
Southern Michigan

“To be able to feed it like that — as it needed it — really made a big difference in our operation.” See More

JC Henrekin
Deer Grove, Illinois

With the improved placement, frankly it's a game changer in terms of growing corn at a higher level in the neighborhood that we farm.

Stan and Aaron Smith
Southern Michigan

Trial Data

+29.5 bu/A
+32 bu/A
+47 bu/A
+56.3 bu/A

+29.5 bu/A: Southern Illinois

This trial compared eight different application plans with 16 total passes in the field and compared the yield impact of mid-season nitrogen application with a one-and-done approach.

Split nitrogen application in this trial improved yield as compared to the control (200 lb. of N applied preplant). The trial also showed that the addition of 360 Y‑DROP N application increased yield by an average of 29.5 bu/A. In low ground areas where heavy rain had a large impact through ponding, 360 Y‑DROP boosted yield by 35 bu/A.

Strip lb. N in Spring lb. N at Planting lb. N at V6 lb. N at V12 Yield bu/A
1 150 0 0 50 w/ 360 Y‑DROP 126
2 150 0 65 w/ 360 Y‑DROP 0 108.5
3 0 70 65 w/ 360 Y‑DROP 65 w/ 360 Y‑DROP 138
4 0 70 0 130 w/ 360 Y‑DROP 156
5 200 0 0 0 97
Results 1
lb. N in Spring
150
lb. N at Planting
0
lb. N at V6
0
lb. N at V12
50 w/ 360 Y‑DROP
Yield bu/A
126
lb. N in Spring
150
lb. N at Planting
0
lb. N at V6
65 w/ 360 Y‑DROP
lb. N at V12
0
Yield bu/A
108.5
lb. N in Spring
0
lb. N at Planting
70
lb. N at V6
65 w/ 360 Y‑DROP
lb. N at V12
65 w/ 360 Y‑DROP
Yield bu/A
138
lb. N in Spring
0
lb. N at Planting
70
lb. N at V6
0
lb. N at V12
130 w/ 360 Y‑DROP
Yield bu/A
156
lb. N in Spring
200
lb. N at Planting
0
lb. N at V6
0
lb. N at V12
0
Yield bu/A
97

+32 bu/A: Central Illinois

This trial compared several different nitrogen application plans, including a prescription determined through in-season nitrate nitrogen measurement with 360 SOILSCAN.

By using in-field soil testing equipment, the farmer knew exactly how much N was needed to finish the season and the yield results paid off. In the strip where 150 lb. of nitrogen was applied at V9 per the 360 SOILSCAN recommendation, the yield was 212 bu/A — the largest yield of the entire trial.

By trying a split-nitrogen application – where 125 pounds was applied pre-plant and 100 pounds was applied at V9 with 360 Y-DROP – this grower experienced an advantage of 32 bu/A when compared with a one-and-done application of 225 pounds of AMS preplant.

Strip lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant lb. 28% UAN @ V9 Yield bu/A
1 125 0 1501 212
2 125 0 100 200
3 125 0 502 134
4 125 0 0 86
5 125 100 0 178
6 225 0 0 168
Results 2
lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant
125
lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant
0
lb. 28% UAN @ V9
1501
Yield bu/A
212
lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant
125
lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant
0
lb. 28% UAN @ V9
100
Yield bu/A
200
lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant
125
lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant
0
lb. 28% UAN @ V9
502
Yield bu/A
134
lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant
125
lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant
0
lb. 28% UAN @ V9
0
Yield bu/A
86
lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant
125
lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant
100
lb. 28% UAN @ V9
0
Yield bu/A
178
lb. AMS 3 Days Pre-Plant
225
lb. ESN 3 Days Pre-Plant
0
lb. 28% UAN @ V9
0
Yield bu/A
168

+47 bu/A: Central Illinois

This side-by-side central Illinois trial compared N timing and placement with 360 Y‑DROP versus a coulter. The coulter application was done at V6 (early June) and the 360 Y‑DROP application at V16 (early July). Both sidedress applications were 150 lb. of N after 100 lb. of N was applied as a base on the whole field, including 30 lb. with the planter (2x2) and 70 lb. of weed and feed worked in with a vertical tillage tool just prior to planting. This yield map shows actual harvest data and yield results.

This side-by-side central Illinois trial compared N timing and placement with 360 Y‑DROP versus a coulter. The coulter application was done at V6 (early June) and the 360 Y‑DROP application at V16 (early July). Both sidedress applications were 150 lb. of N after 100 lb. of N was applied as a base on the whole field, including 30 lb. with the planter (2x2) and 70 lb. of weed and feed worked in with a vertical tillage tool just prior to planting. This yield map shows actual harvest data and yield results.

Point Yield bu/A with 360 Y‑DROP Yield bu/A with Coulter 360 Y‑DROP Advantage bu/A
1 244 208 +36
2 244 160 +84
3 313 290 +23
Results 3
Yield bu/A with 360 Y‑DROP
244
Yield bu/A with Coulter
208
360 Y‑DROP Advantage bu/A
+36
Yield bu/A with 360 Y‑DROP
244
Yield bu/A with Coulter
160
360 Y‑DROP Advantage bu/A
+84
Yield bu/A with 360 Y‑DROP
313
Yield bu/A with Coulter
290
360 Y‑DROP Advantage bu/A
+23

+56.3 bu/A: Southern Michigan

This side-by-side trial in Southern Michigan aimed to compare yield impacts of traditional sidedress applications at V6 with a coulter bar with a mid-season N application at V10 with 360 Y‑DROP. The same amount of nitrogen was used for both applications — timing and placement were the only variables.

Historical rainfall totals early in the growing season put much of the N applied at V6 at risk of loss in the environment. In contrast, the V10 application of N with 360 Y‑DROP repositioned N when the corn's needs were larger.

Strip Application lb. N at Planting lb. N at V6 lb. N at V12 Yield bu/A
1 360 Y‑DROP 60 0 105 251.5
2 Coulter 60 105 0 195.2
Results 4
Application
360 Y‑DROP
lb. N at Planting
60
lb. N at V6
0
lb. N at V12
105
Yield bu/A
251.5
Equipment
Coulter
lb. N at Planting
60
lb. N at V6
105
lb. N at V12
0
Yield bu/A
195.2
DOWNLOAD OUR COMPLETE LIST OF TRIAL STUDIES

We tested our base-plus approach in 100 trials across the Corn Belt. Download the 2015 Yield Book to see the positive impact on yields.

DOWNLOAD YIELD BOOK